Community of lawyers.
Common purpose.
Shared goals.

Robert C. Dortch, Jr. | Sellers Hinshaw Ayers Dortch & Lyons PA | Charlotte

Camille Stell



Camille Stell is President of Lawyers Mutual Consulting and Services, offering succession planning, business development coaching, keynote presentations and more. Continue this conversation by contacting Camille at camille@lawyersmutualconsulting.com or 800.662.8843.

UnusedTehnology

Law firms are investing more in technology than ever before. Practice management systems, document automation tools, e-discovery platforms, AI-assisted research – the list continues to grow. Yet in many firms, a surprising reality exists: the technology is there, but it isn’t being used – or at least not used effectively.

This phenomenon is often referred to as “shelfware” – tools the firm pays for that sit idle or are only partially utilized. While it may seem like a budgeting issue, the true cost runs much deeper. And importantly, paralegals are in a unique position to help solve the problem.

The Hidden Costs of Underutilized Technology

When technology isn’t fully used, the most obvious impact is financial. Firms continue to pay subscription fees for systems that deliver little return on investment. In some cases, firms even purchase new tools to solve problems that existing systems could already address.

But the financial cost is only part of the story.

Underutilized technology often leads to inefficiency. Paralegals and attorneys may revert to manual processes – recreating documents, tracking deadlines in spreadsheets, or duplicating data entry – when a system is designed to streamline those very tasks. Over time, these workarounds add up to significant lost time and frustration.

There is also a risk component. Inconsistent use of technology can lead to disorganized files, missed deadlines, and incomplete documentation. From a risk management perspective, failing to use available systems properly can increase the likelihood of errors that could have been prevented.

Why Technology Goes Underused

If the tools are available, why aren’t they being used?

In many firms, the issue begins with training. A new system is implemented, initial training is provided, and then… nothing. Without ongoing reinforcement, users revert to familiar habits. New hires may never receive meaningful training at all.

Implementation challenges also play a role. Technology is sometimes purchased without fully considering how it will fit into existing workflows. If a system doesn’t align with how work actually gets done, it is unlikely to be adopted.

And of course, there is the human factor. Lawyers and staff are busy. Learning a new system can feel like an added burden rather than a benefit, especially if the advantages aren’t immediately clear.

Finally, many firms lack an internal champion, someone responsible for encouraging adoption, answering questions, and keeping the system top of mind.

The Paralegal’s Strategic Role

This is where paralegals come in.

Paralegals are often the most knowledgeable professionals in the firm when it comes to how work actually flows – from client intake to document preparation to file management. That perspective makes paralegals uniquely positioned to identify when technology is not being used to its full potential.

You may already see it happening:

  • A document automation tool that no one uses
  • A case management system used only for basic storage
  • Attorneys tracking tasks outside the system the firm invested in

Recognizing these gaps is the first step. Acting on them is where paralegals can truly add value.

By becoming a resource for technology within the firm, even informally, you can help bridge the gap between what the firm owns and what it actually uses.

Practical Ways Paralegals Can Help

You don’t need to be an IT professional to make a meaningful impact. Small, practical steps can lead to significant improvements.

Start by taking inventory. What systems does your firm already pay for? Which features are actually being used? Which are not? Even a basic “technology audit” can reveal opportunities.

Next, focus on small wins. Instead of trying to overhaul processes firm-wide, identify one feature or function that could save time and demonstrate its value. For example, showing an attorney how to automate a frequently used document or track deadlines more effectively within an existing system.

Creating simple resources can also make a difference. Quick reference guides, short how-to videos, or checklists for common tasks can make technology more approachable and less intimidating. This is a great place where an AI tool such as ChatGPT can be helpful. I’ve used ChatGPT to create many Technology User Guides for the technology that I needed some introductory help with or to move me to the next-level of knowledge and utilization.

Standardizing processes is another key step. When everyone uses systems in a consistent way, whether for naming files, managing tasks, or generating documents, the value of the technology increases significantly. Another great place to use an AI tool – creating process and procedures for your firm.

Finally, share what you observe. If a system is underutilized, there may be a reason. Providing feedback to firm leadership about what is working, and what is not, can lead to better training, improved processes, or more informed decisions about future technology investments.

Overcoming Common Barriers

Of course, change is not always easy.

Time constraints are a common concern. The key is to frame technology as a time-saver, not an added task. Even small efficiencies, repeated over time, can have a meaningful impact.

Attorney buy-in can also be a challenge. Focusing on benefits such as reduced risk, improved organization, and better client service can help shift the conversation.

And for those who may feel less confident with technology, it’s important to remember that expertise develops over time. Asking questions and exploring systems is part of the process.

Turning Cost into Value

Law firms do not always need more technology. Often, they need to better use what they already have.

Paralegals play a critical role in making that happen. By identifying inefficiencies, encouraging adoption, and helping standardize processes, you can help your firm maximize its investment in technology.

In doing so, you are not just supporting the work – you are improving how the work gets done. And that is where real value is created.

ChatGPT screen

Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved from being an experimental, futuristic concept to a practical, everyday tool inside law firms of all sizes. According to the 2024 Clio Legal Trends Report, 79% of lawyers now use AI in their practice, and Thomson Reuters reports that 77% of legal professionals expect AI to have a transformational impact within the next five years. The question firms must now ask is no longer “Should we use AI?” but “How should we use AI strategically, ethically, and profitably?”

The answer begins with understanding the technology, assessing your firm’s needs, and creating a thoughtful approach to adoption.

Understanding AI and Its Role in Today’s Legal Practice

Before integrating AI into a law firm, leaders must understand the types of AI tools available and what they can – and cannot – do.

Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI

AI describes technology that performs functions requiring human reasoning, such as pattern recognition, decision-making, or language processing.

Generative AI extends this capability by creating new content such as drafting documents, summarizing depositions, generating images for marketing, or even writing first drafts of contracts or client letters.

Agentic AI: The Next Evolution

Unlike traditional AI tools that respond only when prompted, agentic AI can take actions autonomously. An agentic AI system might monitor client emails, draft responses, update the case file, and schedule follow-up tasks – without a lawyer prompting each step – proactive rather than reactive. We can expect to see continued development in this area in platforms such as practice management tools where the AI will have access to our email, our contacts, our calendars, and our documents. Likely scenarios include reviewing our email and calendars to determine deadline dates, then using access to our correspondence files to draft status updates to clients.

The Market Momentum Behind AI Adoption

Lawyers who embrace AI will replace those who resist it, not because AI replaces lawyers, but because AI dramatically increases efficiency. Firms will perform work faster, more accurately, and at lower cost, enabling lawyers to focus on high-value strategic tasks and client service.

Why AI Strategy Matters: Ethics, Competitiveness, and Client Expectations

Ethical Considerations: 2024 NC State Bar Formal Ethics Opinion 1

The North Carolina State Bar issued 2024 Formal Ethics Opinion 1, confirming that nothing in the Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits lawyers from using AI. The opinion emphasizes:

  • Lawyers must supervise AI use as they would nonlawyer assistants.
  • Confidentiality requirements apply when inputting client data into AI systems.
  • Lawyers may need to inform clients when AI substantially affects representation or costs.
  • Billing must reflect fairness and transparency.

Client Expectations

Clients increasingly expect modern tools, efficiency, and transparent pricing. AI supports flat fees, subscriptions, unbundled services, and hybrid billing, all models that align with contemporary client demands.

Conducting a Law Firm AI Readiness Assessment

A structured, thoughtful assessment ensures that AI adoption aligns with firm goals rather than occurring as shiny-object experimentation.

Step 1: Identify Strategic Goals

Firms should begin by asking:

  • What are our priorities for the next 1–3 years, such as growth, profitability, market reach, client service?
  • Where are our operational bottlenecks?
  • Which workflows drain time or create client dissatisfaction?

The goal is to evaluate AI not as a gadget, but as a tool for business transformation.

Step 2: Map Out Key Workflows

Understanding where time is spent reveals where AI offers the highest ROI. Common workflows include:

  • Client intake, conflict checks, and onboarding
  • Document drafting and review
  • Legal research and due diligence
  • Billing and timekeeping
  • Marketing and business development
  • Knowledge management and training

By identifying repetitive or predictable tasks, firms can pinpoint where automation will have the most significant impact.

Step 3: Explore Use Cases and Evaluate Tools

AI tools designed for law firms now fall into clear categories:

Practice Management AI

  • Clio Duo
  • MyCase IQ
  • Smokeball AI

Document Drafting & Review AI

  • Spellbook
  • Harvey
  • CoCounsel

Legal Research AI

  • Lexis+ AI
  • Westlaw Precision AI
  • Casetext

General Productivity AI

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot
  • ChatGPT Enterprise
  • Specialized GPTs

Each solution should be evaluated based on:

  • Alignment with firm goals
  • Ease of integration
  • Cost versus value
  • Ethical and security considerations

Step 4: Run a Measurable Pilot Project

Pilot projects allow the firm to adopt AI in a controlled, low-risk environment. Possible pilots include:

  • Email summarization tools that create action lists from long email chains
  • Drafting pilots, where AI produces first drafts of letters, agreements, or standard documents
  • Billing description generators that reduce write-offs
  • Meeting transcript summarizers
  • AI training tools that create quizzes, flashcards, or summaries for associates

Success is measured by time saved, accuracy, user satisfaction, and client feedback.

Step 5: Evaluate, Refine, and Build an AI Roadmap

Once pilot projects conclude, firms should hold a debrief:

  • What worked well?
  • What frustrated users?
  • What should be expanded across the firm?

These insights allow the firm to create a 6–12-month roadmap outlining training, tool acquisition, workflow redesign, and long-term AI strategy.

IV. Determining the Right Use Cases for Your Firm

High-Value Use Cases

Most firms find strong early wins in:

  • Drafting and summarizing legal documents
  • Reviewing contracts for key clauses
  • Conducting research and generating persuasive arguments
  • Creating marketing content and business development materials
  • Automating administrative tasks like billing narratives or meeting notes

These tasks offer measurable time savings and pose minimal ethical risk when supervised properly.

Use Cases Requiring Extra Caution

  • Math- or calculation-heavy tasks
  • Fact-specific legal research should only be done with legal research AI tools – LLMs predict language; they do not “search” databases
  • Any workflow involving client data when using unsecured or free AI tools should be prohibited in firm AI policies
  • Final legal analysis without human review is never an option

AI remains a tool – not an autonomous legal decision-maker.

V. Policy Development: Building Ethical and Practical Guardrails

A clear AI Use Policy protects clients, lawyers, and the firm. Core components include:

  • Approved AI tools and licensing requirements
  • Confidentiality and data-handling rules
  • Procedures for obtaining client consent when needed
  • Guidelines for billing AI-augmented work
  • Requirements for human oversight and review
  • Training expectations for lawyers and staff
  • Prohibited uses for AI tools

Training is essential. Even powerful tools rely on well-crafted prompts which help lawyers provide context, specify outputs, and shape high-quality AI responses.

VII. The Business Impact of AI on Billing and Law Firm Economics

AI increases efficiency so dramatically that the traditional billable hour model faces unavoidable pressure. Firms are beginning to explore:

  • Flat or fixed fees
  • Subscription-based legal services
  • Hybrid fee arrangements
  • Unbundled services

This shift doesn’t diminish value – it redefines it. Because AI reduces time spent on repetitive work, firms can refocus on strategic tasks: counseling, advocacy, negotiation, and client relationship management.

Firms must also rethink how they measure internal performance and compensation systems when hours no longer tell the full story.

VIII. AI Is Not Replacing Lawyers – But Lawyers Who Use AI Will Replace Those Who Don’t

AI is not a threat to skilled legal professionals. It cannot replicate empathy, judgment, persuasion, or relationship-building. What AI can do is handle repetitive, tedious, or time-consuming tasks, giving lawyers more time to engage in high-value strategic work.

In short: AI won’t take your job, but a lawyer who leverages AI might.

Conclusion: A Strategic Roadmap for the Future of Legal Work

The firms that will thrive in the next decade are not the ones that adopt AI the fastest, they are the ones that adopt it intentionally.

A successful approach includes:

  • Understanding the technology
  • Evaluating strategic goals
  • Pilot projects using tools with measurable outcomes
  • Developing ethical policies
  • Training staff
  • Redesigning workflows
  • Rethinking billing and performance models

AI adoption is not a one-time decision. It is a continuous innovation journey. But with the right framework, law firms can use AI to enhance efficiency, elevate client service, reduce burnout, and build healthier, more profitable practices.

FileRetention

At Lawyers Mutual, we regularly remind insureds that strong practice management starts with strong file management. A well-designed file retention and destruction policy protects the client, the lawyer, and the law firm—while ensuring compliance with the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct. Here is a helpful blueprint for firms seeking to modernize their approach to storing, managing, and ultimately destroying client files. 

Start with a Clear Closing Process

Good file management doesn’t conclude at the end of the representation. Rather, your firm policy should emphasize returning all original documents of legal significance to the client – such as wills, deeds, and settlement agreements – and confirming the client’s receipt. Once originals are returned, the file should be organized, labeled “Closed,” and reviewed to determine which materials are essential and which may be discarded.

Know What Must Stay—and for How Long

North Carolina requires lawyers to retain closed client files for at least six years, with additional time required for matters involving minors, continuing obligations, or potential claims. 

Essential items typically retained include:

  • Filed pleadings and substantive correspondence
  • Fee agreements and closing letters
  • Final versions of legal documents
  • Notes documenting client instructions or strategic decisions

Meanwhile, lawyers may safely discard duplicate documents, administrative emails, and drafts or notes that have no continuing relevance.

Manage Email and Electronic Files with Intention

Keep in mind your policy should incorporates guidance from NC State Bar formal ethics opinion 2013 FEO 15, reminding lawyers that electronic records must be accessible, secure, and backed up for the full retention period. Substantive emails should be saved to the client file; there is no need to keep routine scheduling or logistical communications.

Secure Storage

Confidentiality obligations extend to both storage and destruction. Paper files should be locked and protected and out of client view; electronic records must remain encrypted and access-controlled via digital security measures. 

Ethically Compliant File Destruction: Practical Methods

When the retention period has expired and the file is eligible for destruction, firms must take care to dispose of materials in a manner that fully protects client confidentiality. For paper files, shredding remains the gold standard – either through an in-house cross-cut shredder or a reputable third-party shredding service that provides secure bins and certificates of destruction. 

Electronic files require a more technical approach: lawyers should use secure-wipe tools or data-erasure software that permanently deletes files from servers, hard drives, and backup systems. Simply dragging files to the trash folder is not sufficient. Firms should also verify that any vendors assisting with destruction follow strict confidentiality protocols. Maintaining a File Destruction Log adds an extra layer of accountability and helps demonstrate compliance if questions arise later.

Communicate with Clients Early and Often

A helpful practice is to inform clients upfront – via engagement letters and closing letters – about the firm’s retention and destruction practices. Transparency reduces future confusion and builds client trust.

Conclusion

A thoughtful file retention policy is more than an administrative tool, it’s a risk-management strategy. It protects lawyers, supports ethical compliance, and ensures clients receive the level of professionalism they deserve. Now is an excellent time for firms to review their own policies to ensure they align with current rules, technology, and best practices.

paralegal pointer

The dawn of the fully digital courthouse in North Carolina is no longer on the horizon, it’s here. On October 13, 2025, the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts (NCAOC) announced that all 100 counties in the state had gone live on the ecourts platform, making North Carolina the first U.S. state to convert its entire trial-court system to the cloud.

For paralegals, legal assistants, and other law firm staff, this milestone is more than just a headline – it marks a fundamental shift in how filings, document management, service contacts, and docket monitoring will happen going forward. With this change comes both opportunity and risk: greater efficiency, but also new procedures, new rules, and new oversight responsibilities.

Why the Change Matters

Historically, North Carolina’s courts relied heavily on paper-records, older case-management platforms and manual processes. The patchwork of legacy systems was in need of a technology makeover.

Today, the system known as Odyssey allows:

  • Attorneys and their staff to file electronically from anywhere, 24/7
  • Court records, dockets and filings to be searchable online through the state’s Portal system.
  • Accurate tracking of filings, service contacts, fee payments, and electronic alerts – tasks that previously fell to manual tracking.

However, it also places new accountability on firms to adhere to filing rules, ensure PDF document quality, track acceptance/rejection statuses, and monitor e-service logs.

For law-firm staff, the transformation means your role is evolving. Filing isn’t just uploading a PDF –  it’s verifying permissions, understanding system logic (e.g., the difference between a new case vs. existing case filings), staying on top of service and notification requirements, and using the Portal for case monitoring. Paralegals and legal assistants become gatekeepers of compliance, workflow clarity and risk mitigation.

Training Law Firm Staff

Here are key domains your team must master to stay ahead:

A. Account setup & Firm administrator role

  • One user per firm should be designated as the Firm Administrator in the File & Serve system. That admin creates the firm account, then invites attorneys, paralegals, assistants, and other users. 
  • Make sure each user has an individual login, correct email (for e-service), and understands their role.
  • For Portal access, determine who needs standard vs. Elevated Access (for confidential cases) and how to maintain the firm’s Address of Record for service.

B. Electronic filing (File & Serve) workflow

  • Understand how to initiate a new case vs. filing into an existing case.
  • Know the system’s PDF rules, naming conventions, size limits and need to upload exhibits/attachments correctly.
  • Monitor the status of filings: “Submitted,” “Under Review,” “Accepted,” or “Returned for Correction.” Only after “Accepted” is the filing complete.
  • Make sure service contacts are entered correctly, and that e-service is handled properly (especially when filing triggers automatic service via the system).

C. Record access & the Portal

  • Staff should similarly be trained on: how to search by case number/party name; use Smart Search filters; check hearing calendars; pay fines; and monitor dispositions.
  • Understand what access you have (public vs. elevated) and how to query judgments, indexes, etc.

D. Firm procedure & risk management

  • Create internal checklists for filings: name of case, user uploading, PDF quality check, service contact review, fees, timestamp, status.
  • Maintain a log of accepted filings vs. rejected filings to identify training gaps.
  • Ensure that staff keep abreast of rule changes (such as amendments to the General Rules of Practice that affect e-filing) and county-specific quirks (though the system is statewide, some local workflows may still apply).
  • Build protocols for support/technical issues – who to contact, fallback procedures, how to document issues, etc.

Key Training Resources

Your training plan should rely on up-to-date, official resources tailored for attorneys and for staff supporting filings and records. Below are essential links:

Here are some ideas for training for your firm:

  1. Enroll all relevant staff (paralegals, legal assistants, docket clerks) in the next available virtual or in-person training session offered through the NCAOC.
  2. Set aside a “firm-wide eCourts orientation” after staff complete on-demand modules.
  3. Update your firm’s internal procedures based on the training and checklist: document naming standards, quality-check steps, service contact verification, archive of accepted filings, fallback for downtime.
  4. Set a schedule for periodic review/refresher training (e.g., every 6 months) because the system will continue evolving and additional counties may have transitional issues.

What Paralegals Should Focus on Now

  • Stay ahead of the learning curve: training proactively gives your firm a competitive and risk-mitigating advantage.
  • Treat filing and docketing workflows like risk-management tools: a filing rejected due to user error can expose the firm to missed deadlines, client dissatisfaction, and malpractice exposure.
  • Embrace the change: this is not simply “upload the PDF and forget it.” It’s about ensuring the entire lifecycle of the case – from e-file to service to docket monitoring – is accurate and trackable.
  • Communicate with attorneys: Keep them apprised of the status of filings and any issues flagged by the system. Consider creating a weekly internal “eCourts status” email summarizing successful filings, rejections, and any system glitches.
  • Leverage the Portal: Set up saved searches for key client matters, monitor upcoming hearing dates, dispositions, and filings by opposing counsel. Efficient use can give your firm a strategic edge.

The full rollout of ecourts in North Carolina marks a defining moment in our legal system. For paralegals and law-firm staff, this is an opportunity to play a strategic role – ensuring smooth e-filing workflows, precise record access, superior client service, and robust internal risk controls. By mastering the tools (File & Serve and the Portal), leveraging the available training resources, and aligning internal firm procedures, your team will not only stay compliant but also help your firm thrive in the digital era.

Jays stories

For more than two decades, Jay Reeves was a familiar voice in the pages of the Lawyers Mutual newsletter. His column, Ask the Risk Man, blended practical guidance on risk management with reflections drawn from everyday life. Jay’s readers will remember stories of his children, his years growing up in small-town South Carolina, his early days practicing law in Charleston, and his enduring love of baseball and vinyl records.

Jay’s ability to weave lessons about law and life into warm, relatable narratives made him a trusted advisor and a beloved storyteller for our insureds. His words often reminded us that while law is a serious business, it is also a profoundly human one.

We’re delighted to share that Jay has launched a new writing venture, Jay’s Stories, a weekly Substack newsletter dedicated to “the essential, enduring, and effervescent power of story.” In his words, stories “shape and define us,” and by sharing them, “we complete the circuit, and love flows.”

Subscribers can expect the same humor, insight, and heart that have always defined Jay’s work. Upcoming stories range from a meditation on Marvin Gaye’s classic What’s Going On, to an encounter with the grave of baseball legend Shoeless Joe Jackson, to musings on Wordle, optimism, and even Albert Einstein.

We invite you to join Jay on this new journey. Subscribing to Jay’s Stories is free, and each week you’ll find a new reflection waiting in your inbox. Whether you’re looking for practical wisdom, a reminder of the joy in everyday life, or just a good story well told, Jay delivers.

Subscribe to Jay’s Stories here:

Jay’s Stories – by Jay Reeves – Jay’s Stories

We hope you’ll stay connected with Jay in this new chapter and continue to be inspired by his gift for storytelling.

1 2 3 19 20 21