U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Addresses Medicaid Liens in Tort Settlements
If your practice areas include litigation, insurance or healthcare law, you should know about the recent U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Gallardo v. Marstiller. The ruling, handed down on June 6, 2022, allows states to pursue Medicaid reimbursement for tort settlements that cover future medical expenses. Funds in the settlement agreement designated for future medical care could be subject to a Medicaid lien.
Lawyers Mutual issued a Risk Management Alert notifying North Carolina lawyers of the ruling.
Why choose Lawyers Mutual for your financial protection? One reason is experience. Lawyers Mutual has been in business since 1977 and insures more than 8000 lawyers in North Carolina. We’ve been providing continuous protection from professional liability to NC lawyers longer than any other insurance company. Another reason is stability. The company’s financial strength is absolute. Since 1999, Lawyers Mutual has paid dividends fourteen times, with more than $8 million dollars returned to policyholders since 2011. Want even more reasons? Visit our website, give us a call, or ask a colleague why Lawyers Mutual is the smart choice for liability coverage.
US Supreme Court Permits States to Seek Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Care
Following is the full text of the Lawyers Mutual Risk Management Alert:
On June 6, 2022, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Gallardo v. Marstiller, Sec’y of the Fla. Agency for Health Care, 2022 U.S. Lexis 2683, and held that the Medicaid Act permits States to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care. The full opinion can be read here.
The case involved a settlement of $800,000 for injuries a minor received when she was hit by a truck after stepping off a school bus. Under Florida’s statutory formula, the State’s presumptive allocation was $300,000 of the settlement amount. The State had already paid approximately $862,000. The settlement allocated $35,367.52 to past medical expenses and no specific amount to future medical expenses. Florida argued that it could seek reimbursement from settlement monies for both past and future medical expenses and was not limited to the $35,367.52 allocated for past expenses. The Supreme Court held that Florida Medicaid could seek reimbursement from any settlement funds representing payment for medical expenses-whether past or future medical expenses.
North Carolina attorneys should be cognizant of this new opinion and understand that any monies designated for future medical care in a tort settlement could be subject to a Medicaid lien. Specifically allocating part of a settlement to past medical expenses will not necessarily limit a State’s claim for Medicaid reimbursement. If you suspect your client is a Medicaid beneficiary, write to the North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Third-Party Recovery Section, to determine if there is lien and, if so, the amount of the lien. If you contend there are any unrelated payments, you can contest those charges and try to negotiate the amount of the lien with the Third-Party Recovery Section.
Sources: Person v. Marstiller, Sec'y of the Fla. Agency for Health Care (nmcdn.io)
Lawyers Mutual is here for you at every stage of your law career: from your first day on the job to your last day before retirement. Our Byte of Prevention blog features industry news, tips and valuable links on everything from work-life balance to winding down your practice. Our email newsletter “Practice Reimagined” brings cutting-edge insights straight to your in-box. And our skilled team of underwriters, claims counsel and risk management professionals are by your side when you need us most. Lawyers helping lawyers. It’s who we are, and it’s what we’ve been doing since 1977.
